![Lump-Sum Investing vs. Dollar-Cost Averaging: Actual Outcomes](https://shorepointadvisors.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Lump-Sum-Investing-vs-Dollar-Cost-Averaging-Actual-Outcomes-300x200.jpg.webp)
Lump-Sum Investing vs. Dollar-Cost Averaging: Actual Outcomes
Discussing lump-sum investing vs. dollar-cost averaging, let’s look at when dollar-cost averaging may be preferred.
One common concern about the increasing popularity of index funds is whether the corresponding decline in active management has impacted the function of markets. The premise is that a higher proportion of assets in index funds means fewer non-index investors devoting resources to analyzing securities, thereby increasing the chances of mispriced securities.
If the rise in indexing was producing low-hanging mispricing fruit, it sure is not showing up in the performance of actively managed mutual funds and ETFs in the US. Even as the percent of index assets has expanded (jumping from 32% to 58% in just the past 10 years, according to ICI’s 2024 Fact Book), the percentage of active equity funds outperforming their benchmarks over rolling three-year periods has not changed by much.
It is debatable whether index fund assets should be equated with passive behavior. And judging by the active fund landscape, it is hard to argue markets are any less effective at incorporating information into prices.
Percentage of Non-Index Equity Funds Outperforming Over Rolling Three-Year Periods, 2004–2023
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
This article originally appeared in Above the Fray, a weekly newsletter for Dimensional clients.
APPENDIX
Data Sample
The sample includes US-domiciled, USD-denominated open-end and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the Morningstar categories listed below. Index funds, load-waived funds, and funds of funds are excluded from the industry sample.
Methodology
Equity mutual fund outperformance percentages are shown for the three-year periods ending December 31 of each year, 2004 through 2023. Outperformers are funds with return observations for every month of the three-year period whose cumulative net return over the period exceeded that of their respective primary prospectus benchmark. The beginning samples include funds as of the start of the three-year periods. Each fund is evaluated relative to its primary prospectus benchmark. Where the full series of primary prospectus benchmark returns is unavailable, funds are instead evaluated relative to their Morningstar category index. We aggregate funds with multiple share classes to the strategy level.
Morningstar Categories
Fund sample includes the following Morningstar historical categories: Diversified Emerging Markets, Europe Stock, Foreign Large Blend, Foreign Large Growth, Foreign Large Value, Foreign Small/Mid Blend, Foreign Small/Mid Growth, Foreign Small/Mid Value, Global Real Estate, Japan Stock, Large Blend, Large Growth, Large Value, Mid-Cap Blend, Mid-Cap Growth, Mid-Cap Value, Miscellaneous Region, Pacific/Asia ex-Japan Stock, Real Estate, Small Blend, Small Growth, Small Value, Global Large-Stock Blend, Global Large-Stock Growth, Global Large-Stock Value, and Global Small/Mid Stock.
DISCLOSURES
The information in this material is intended for the recipient’s background information and use only. It is provided in good faith and without any warranty or representation as to accuracy or completeness. Information and opinions presented in this material have been obtained or derived from sources believed by Dimensional to be reliable, and Dimensional has reasonable grounds to believe that all factual information herein is true as at the date of this material. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer of any services or products for sale and is not intended to provide a sufficient basis on which to make an investment decision. Before acting on any information in this document, you should consider whether it is appropriate for your particular circumstances and, if appropriate, seek professional advice. It is the responsibility of any persons wishing to make a purchase to inform themselves of and observe all applicable laws and regulations. Unauthorized reproduction or transmission of this material is strictly prohibited. Dimensional accepts no responsibility for loss arising from the use of the information contained herein.
This material is not directed at any person in any jurisdiction where the availability of this material is prohibited or would subject Dimensional or its products or services to any registration, licensing, or other such legal requirements within the jurisdiction.
“Dimensional” refers to the Dimensional separate but affiliated entities generally, rather than to one particular entity. These entities are Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd., Dimensional Ireland Limited, DFA Australia Limited, Dimensional Fund Advisors Canada ULC, Dimensional Fund Advisors Pte. Ltd., Dimensional Japan Ltd., and Dimensional Hong Kong Limited. Dimensional Hong Kong Limited is licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission to conduct Type 1 (dealing in securities) regulated activities only and does not provide asset management services.
RISKS
Investments involve risks. The investment return and principal value of an investment may fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original value. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee strategies will be successful.
DISCLAIMER
Shore Point Advisors is an investment adviser located in Brielle, New Jersey. Shore Point Advisors is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. Shore Point Advisors only transacts business in states in which it is properly registered or is excluded or exempted from registration. Insurance products and services are offered through JCL Financial, LLC (“JCL”). Shore Point Advisors and JCL are affiliated entities.
Discussing lump-sum investing vs. dollar-cost averaging, let’s look at when dollar-cost averaging may be preferred.
In a match-up between lump-sum investing vs. dollar-cost averaging, which is the better bet?
Market performance in 2024 reflected the power of human ingenuity, which kept the economic engine going.
Let’s focus on actionable strategies to manage money scripts, flip unhelpful patterns and build healthier financial behaviors.